DRAFT — content pending medical review. Do not share.

Field Guides / Guide 11

Choosing Your GLP-1 — Sema vs Tirze vs Reta

The head-to-head everyone asks first — the three weight anchors compared on results, track record, side-effect profile, and who each one actually fits.

Every weight conversation on this site eventually lands on the same question: which one? Here's the three-way comparison in plain English — the same facts that live on the individual profiles, lined up side by side.

The three-second version

Semaglutide Tirzepatide Retatrutide
Mechanism GLP-1 GLP-1 + GIP (dual) GLP-1 + GIP + glucagon (triple)
Trial-reported loss ~15% ~15–21% ~24% (phase 2)
Track record Longest — years of approved use Long — approved, massive real-world base Frontier — still in trials
Typical ladder top 2.4 mg/wk 15 mg/wk 8–12 mg/wk
Personality The gentle proven one The proven heavyweight The biggest numbers, least history

How to actually choose

What doesn't change, whichever you pick

  1. The ladder is the law. Every one of these titrates from a low start — the Titration Planner dates the whole climb and counts the vials: semaglutide ladder · tirzepatide ladder · retatrutide ladder · cagrilintide ladder.
  2. GI tolerance sets the pace. Nausea means hold the step longer, not push through. Slower ladders end at the same place.
  3. The anchor alone loses weight; the program keeps what matters. Muscle loss is the GLP-1 era's quiet failure — the Weight & Metabolic Program exists to protect training quality, lean mass, and metabolism around whichever anchor you run.
  4. Never inside a fight camp — appetite suppression and double sessions don't mix (the Weight-Cut protocol covers what to do instead).

Research protocols, not a prescription — the GLP-1 class especially is a conversation to have with a physician, and these compounds have approved pharmaceutical forms a doctor can actually prescribe.